Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLei Xu
dc.contributor.authorIris Tien
dc.contributor.authorJohn E. Taylor
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-16T21:52:18Z
dc.date.available2026-02-16T21:52:18Z
dc.date.copyright2025/01/01
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.otherJMENEA.MEENG-6168.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309853
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have shown that responses to information on poor air quality are more discernible on active transport than on driving. However, it is unclear whether the differences in responses stem from the differences between the characteristics of transportation modes or the social context–related factors. We conducted a comparative study to evaluate the effectiveness of air quality alerts in influencing the usage of different transportation modes, namely, micromobility and driving. An examination of over 6.9 million micromobility trips and 3 million traffic counts revealed that usage behaviors on both transportation modes do not change in response to air quality alerts, but both decrease during the daytime of a polluted day. The findings suggest that several social context–related factors matter to the success of air quality alerts, including the overall societal attention/awareness of air quality and the coverage and access to more sustainable transportation modes to empower the public.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleMicromobility versus Driving: How Air Quality Alerts Impact Transportation Choices
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume41
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6168
dc.journal.fristpage04024064-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024064-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 041 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record