Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhengcheng Wang
dc.contributor.authorKai Wu
dc.contributor.authorSongyu Liu
dc.contributor.authorMengyao Li
dc.contributor.authorXiang Zhang
dc.contributor.authorZhenyang Yuan
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-16T21:49:42Z
dc.date.available2026-02-16T21:49:42Z
dc.date.copyright2025/01/01
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.otherJMCEE7.MTENG-18893.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309789
dc.description.abstractThis study advocates a low-carbon foamed concrete (FC), termed alkali residue (AR) ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS)-based FC (AG-FC). A comprehensive assessment of the macro-micro properties of AG-FC and conventional FC (C-FC) was performed through a series of tests, including a compression test, triaxial test, dry–wet cycle test, freeze–thaw cycle test, scanning electron microscope examination, X-ray diffraction analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. The findings reveal that AG-FC exhibits excellent mechanical performance, with a 28-day compressive strength exceeding 1.0 MPa. AG-FC is primarily composed of CaCO3, C─ S─ H, Ca(OH)2, and Friedel’s salt (Fs), whereas C-FC is dominated by C─ S─ H, Ca(OH)2, and CaCO3. AG-FC exhibits excellent durability, with a durability coefficient of 0.798–0.87. During dry–wet cycles, the deterioration primarily arises from pore water pressure, pore gas pressure, and temperature stress. During freeze–thaw cycles, the deterioration effects stem from the pore water pressure and frost heaving force. AG-FC exhibits a noteworthy capability to significantly reduce CO2 emissions, accounting for approximately 35%–40% of the emissions produced by C-FC. AG-FC exhibits noteworthy attributes, including cost-effectiveness, low carbon emissions, environmental friendliness, superior mechanical performance, and exceptional durability, making it highly promising for a wide range of applications.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleLow-Carbon Foamed Concrete Based on Alkali Residue and GGBS versus Conventional Foamed Concrete: Comparative Experimental Research
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume37
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18893
dc.journal.fristpage04024479-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024479-16
dc.page16
dc.treeJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 037 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record