• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Enhanced Performance of Polyelectrolyte-Stabilized Sandy Soils under Wetting and Drying Cycles

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JMCEE7.MTENG-18871.pdf (3.829Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Ardak Makhatova
    Dallas N. Little
    Svetlana A. Sukhishvili
    Eyad Masad
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study addresses the utility of polyelectrolytes, i.e., cationic poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC) and anionic polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), as additives to improve properties of the polymer-stabilized soil. This paper specifically focuses on the resistance of polymer-stabilized soils to degradation and/or damage during and following multiple wetting–drying cycles (zero, one, two, three, five, and seven cycles). Each cycle consisted of 24 h of moisture conditioning using capillary rise followed by 24 h of drying. Then, these specimens were evaluated for their unconfined compressive strength (UCS). The microstructure and composition of the soils were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), and X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF). Based on the results, the soils used in this study for polymer treatment were primarily composed of carbonates and silicates with a small amount of clay minerals. The polyelectrolyte stabilizers (PDADMAC and PSS) and polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) were added to the soils at dosages ranging from 0.2% to 1.6% by weight of dry polymer to dry soil. Treated soils demonstrated increased UCS compared with untreated counterparts. The untreated soils exhibited rapid degradation of UCS and mechanical collapse within three to four wetting–drying cycles. On the other hand, the polymer-treated soils exhibited a strength reduction of between 10% and 50% following the first cycle and then maintained the UCS of about 3–6 MPa after completion of all wetting–drying cycles. Furthermore, the stabilized soil demonstrated significant improvement in toughness compared with their untreated and cement-treated counterparts. The ability of the polymer-stabilized soils to stand up to wetting–drying cycles is a key finding and contribution of this study.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309784
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV