• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Sustainable Soil Stabilization Technique Using Medical Waste Incineration Ash, Coal-Based Fly Ash, and Polyethylene Terephthalate Strips

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JMCEE7.MTENG-18665.pdf (6.108Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Mohammed Russedul Islam
    Md. Zarif Asif Khan
    Md. Rashadul Islam
    Naveel Islam
    Mohammad Shofiul Azam
    Tanvir Ahmed
    Kshama Roy
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Sustainable soil stabilization refers to using environmentally friendly and long-lasting techniques to improve the strength and durability of the problematic soil, e.g., expansive soil. Using non-energy-intensive materials with lower carbon emissions and recycled materials or waste products in soil stabilization processes can contribute to a long-term sustainable solution. The present study investigates the use of medical waste incineration ash, coal-based fly ash, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) strips to improve the properties of the expansive soil. A comprehensive and systematic laboratory testing scheme was followed to explore the suitability of these materials. Geopolymers (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) are applied progressively for soil stabilization, along with reinforcements by PET strips (0%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2%). Strength improvements of the stabilized soil samples are evaluated by unconfined compressive strength (UCS), flexural strength, and California bearing ratio (CBR) tests. One-day-soaked UCS and 12-cycle wetting-drying tests are conducted to evaluate the short- and long-term durability of the samples. A toxicity-characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) is followed to evaluate the leachate quality. The UCS, flexural strength, CBR values, and retained UCS increase with the increase in geopolymer content (GPC) and PET. The highest CBR value of 145% was obtained for 15% GPC with a 1.5% PET-stabilized soil sample, whereas the CBR value of the natural soil is only 3%. Although insignificant swelling was observed at 5% GPC, no swelling was observed for higher GPC contents, indicating reduced or no expansion for the stabilized soil. Also, after the TCLP test, the heavy metal concentration of the stabilized soil samples was detected to be within the land disposal limits for hazardous wastes, and some of the heavy metals were removed after stabilization with 20% geopolymer.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4309744
    Collections
    • Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV