• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Impact of Non-Uniform Surface Temperature on the Apparent Radiative Properties of Cavity Receivers

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    sol-24-1172.pdf (847.3Kb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Mofidipour, Ehsan
    Jones, Matthew R.
    Iverson, Brian D.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Radiative surface properties play a critical role in the design, analysis and optimization of solar–thermal systems. Cavity receivers increase the efficiency of solar–thermal energy systems through the cavity effect. The cavity effect refers to increased absorption of radiation due to multiple reflections within a cavity. Apparent radiative surface properties of a cavity characterize the effective interactions of radiation passing through an imaginary surface covering the cavity aperture. In this study, we investigate the extent to which the apparent emissivity of a cavity with a non-uniform surface temperature profile may be estimated using an isothermal enclosure model. A cylindrical cavity was assumed to have a linearly increasing, linearly decreasing or parabolic temperature profile. The cavity's apparent emissivity and absorptivity were calculated for various length-to-diameter ratios (L/D) and intrinsic emissivity (ε). This work shows that a spatially varying surface temperature can significantly affect the apparent emissivity and absorptivity, especially for shallow cavities with low intrinsic emissivity. Moreover, under non-isothermal conditions, changes in the cavity's geometry result in larger changes in the apparent radiative properties than observed for isothermal cases. For a cavity with an intrinsic emissivity of 0.3, the percent difference between non-isothermal and isothermal conditions reaches ∼25% for L/D ratios of 4 and 8 for cavities with linearly increasing or parabolic temperature profiles. Similarly, for ε=0.9 and ΔTw/T0=0.1, this difference is <1% across all three wall temperature cases when L/D=4.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4308234
    Collections
    • Journal of Solar Energy Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV