Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaurav Kumar
dc.contributor.authorSanaz Imen
dc.contributor.authorEbrahim Ahmadisharaf
dc.contributor.authorRaquel Neri Barranco
dc.contributor.authorSumon Hossain Rabby
dc.contributor.authorJohn J. Ramirez-Avila
dc.contributor.authorVamsi Sridharan
dc.contributor.authorCraig Lott
dc.contributor.authorRosanna La Plante
dc.contributor.authorHarry X. Zhang
dc.contributor.authorNigel W. T. Quinn
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-17T23:02:02Z
dc.date.available2025-08-17T23:02:02Z
dc.date.copyright7/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.otherJOEEDU.EEENG-8104.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307808
dc.description.abstractThe study investigated the perspectives of professionals involved in total maximum daily load (TMDL) development. A survey instrument was developed to understand the challenges and advancements necessary to enhance water quality management. This survey explored various dimensions of TMDL development, including identifying impaired waterbodies, water quality modeling, implementation, postimplementation assessment, and stakeholder engagement. Thirty-seven professionals involved in TMDL development took the survey. The results indicated a consensus on the need to reassess existing methodologies, particularly in the postimplementation phase, with a strong emphasis on the importance of sufficient funding for data collection. Limited resources, computational challenges, and a lack of trust in advanced models were identified as barriers to advancing water quality modeling. The participants also recognized the urgency of incorporating more validation data, especially through conventional monitoring and remote sensing, to enhance water quality modeling efforts. Although including social systems in modeling was considered crucial, it was not universally prioritized. This study developed a survey instrument to capture the evolving perspectives of stakeholders involved in TMDL processes. The survey’s structure provides a framework that can be improved and adapted for ongoing assessment and improvement. A continuous feedback mechanism, such as the one provided by the survey, is essential for ensuring that TMDL practices remain responsive to emerging challenges and are better equipped to manage water quality in an increasingly complex landscape.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleRethinking TMDLs: Perspective Based on Community Survey
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume151
dc.journal.issue7
dc.journal.titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-8104
dc.journal.fristpage04025034-1
dc.journal.lastpage04025034-14
dc.page14
dc.treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 007
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record