Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYanfang Luo
dc.contributor.authorAli Abbas
dc.contributor.authorJoonOh Seo
dc.contributor.authorSeungjun Ahn
dc.contributor.authorSeung Hyun Cha
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-17T23:00:48Z
dc.date.available2025-08-17T23:00:48Z
dc.date.copyright7/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.otherJMENEA.MEENG-6661.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307776
dc.description.abstractEffective safety management at construction sites requires accurate hazard recognition. However, previous research studies have revealed a significant proportion of hazards remain unrecognized. Poor hazard recognition may be attributed to the deficiency at one or more levels of situational awareness (SA). Understanding how different hazard types, particularly those with high fatality rates, influence workers’ SA is critical to improving safety outcomes. To address this research gap, three hazard types with different fatality hierarchies (F-I: fall, F-II: struck-by, and F-III: electrical hazards) were built in a complex and dynamic virtual reality (VR) construction environment. Participants’ hazard recognition behaviors regarding hazard perception, comprehension, and projection (Level 1, 2, and 3 SA) were measured by a well-recognized situational awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). The findings revealed that the achievement of SA varied among different hazard types and was impacted by fatality hierarchy. There was a consistent decline in success rates from Level 1 to Level 3 SA across all hazards, and the potential to achieve a high-level SA demonstrated a positive correlation with the hazard fatality hierarchy. Specific reasons for failure at each SA level attributed to shortcomings included a deficiency in prior knowledge, narrowed attention, and the increased demand for cognitive resources. The findings enhance the understanding of workers’ SA in hazard recognition behaviors and provide a foundation for developing customized interventions. These interventions can be tailored to address SA deficiencies at different levels based on hazard types with distinct fatality hierarchies, ultimately improving safety performance at construction sites.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleUnderstanding Hazard Recognition Behaviors through Situational Awareness Assessment in Virtual Construction Environments
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume41
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Management in Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6661
dc.journal.fristpage04025017-1
dc.journal.lastpage04025017-12
dc.page12
dc.treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 041 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record