| dc.description.abstract | Self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) tests are widely used in situ investigations, due to their distinct advantage to measure the shear stress–strain–strength properties of the surrounding soil with minimum disturbance. The measured pressuremeter curve can be interpreted using analytical solutions based on the long cylindrical cavity expansion/contraction theory with relatively simple constitutive models, to derive useful soil properties (e.g., undrained shear strength of clay, shear modulus, and friction angle of sand). However, the real soil behavior is more complex than the assumed constitutive relations, and the derived parameters may differ from those obtained using more reliable lab tests. In addition, SBPM tests can be affected by other well-known factors (e.g., installation disturbance, limited length/diameter ratio, and strain rate) that are not considered in the analytical solutions. In this paper, SBPM tests are evaluated using finite-element analysis and the MIT-S1 model, a unified constitutive model for soils, to consider complex soil behavior more realistically. SBPM tests in Boston Blue Clay and Toyoura sands are simulated in axial symmetric and plain strain conditions, and the computed results are interpreted following the suggested procedures by analytical solutions. The derived parameters are compared with those from the stress-strain relations to evaluate the reliability of SBMP tests for practical application. | |
