• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    LUB: A Novel Adaptive Kriging Framework Incorporating Lower and Upper Bound Analysis for Enhanced Structural Reliability-Based Design Optimization

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    AJRUA6.RUENG-1562.pdf (4.265Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Changle Peng
    Cheng Chen
    Oya Mercan
    Tong Guo
    Weijie Xu
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) is increasingly recognized for its potential to enhance the performance of structural engineering systems. Despite its potential, traditional RBDO methods are often hampered by significant computational challenges, especially when applied to nonlinear structures where simultaneous execution of structural optimization and reliability analysis increases the complexity of analysis. This computational burden presents a significant barrier for broader application of RBDO in complex systems, which therefore highlights the need for more efficient approaches. To address this challenge, we introduce an adaptive Kriging-assisted RBDO framework that leverages lower and upper bounds (LUB) analysis to improve its computational efficiency and robustness. In this proposed framework, regions delineated by varying confidence bounds are used for identifying design points close to the limit state. Convergence is rigorously assessed by comparing design and reliability predictions across upper and lower bound interfaces, thereby ensuring both interpretability and robustness. The framework allows for flexibility through its seamless integration with various adaptive sampling processes, evolutionary optimization algorithms, and reliability assessment techniques. The proposed framework is evaluated for four benchmark examples and two engineering cases, demonstrating superior accuracy and efficiency with fewer model evaluations compared with existing approaches. Through iterative optimization, the framework consistently maintains cost and errors of reliability estimation within predefined thresholds, offering robust and computationally efficient solutions.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307170
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV