• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Seismic Performance of Corroded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Columns Reinforced with GFRP Spirals

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JBENF2.BEENG-7216.pdf (3.520Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Sayal Shrestha
    Chris P. Pantelides
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study investigated the impact of corrosion on the seismic performance of bridges constructed using accelerated bridge construction with a focus on post-tensioned (PT) concrete column-to-footing connections. The precast concrete columns were reinforced with longitudinal mild steel bars and either steel spirals (all-steel specimens) or glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) spirals (hybrid specimens). High-strength steel unbonded PT bars were used to connect the precast concrete columns to the footings. A carbon fiber–reinforced polymer jacket was applied to accommodate the increased axial force due to post-tensioning. Four column-to-footing joint specimens were constructed, two with a steel spiral and two with a GFRP spiral. Each column type had one control and one corroded specimen. Quasi-static cyclic load tests were performed to investigate the influence of corrosion on seismic performance. The control specimens with either steel or GFRP spirals reached a 10.0% drift ratio without any bar fracture. However, for the corroded specimens, bar fracture occurred at 5.0% and 7.0% drift ratios for the specimens with steel and GFRP spirals, respectively. The superior performance of the corroded hybrid specimen is attributed to the GFRP spiral in the column, which does not corrode, and thus, it effectively confines the column concrete core. All columns exceeded the 4.0% drift ratio, satisfying the drift limit set in seismic design codes. At a 4.0% drift ratio, the residual drift of the steel spiral–reinforced corroded specimen was 1.4%, whereas the GFRP spiral–reinforced specimen exhibited lower residual displacements under corroded conditions, with a residual drift of 0.7%. At a 4.0% drift ratio, the residual drift of the steel spiral–reinforced control specimen was 0.8% and that of the GFRP spiral–reinforced specimen was 0.5%. Thus, at a 4.0% drift ratio, the two control specimens and the GFRP spiral–reinforced specimen exposed to corrosion exhibit a residual drift below 1.0%, which is acceptable.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307133
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV