• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Investigation of Winglet-Cavity Tip on Aerodynamic Performance in Turbine Cascades Using Large Eddy Simulation

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JAEEEZ.ASENG-4879.pdf (5.312Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Weihang Li
    Shaowen Chen
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In an axial flow turbine, the tip leakage flow leads to considerable tip leakage loss and causes a flow blockage accordingly in the rotor passage. Some passive and active flow control methods have already been carried out to manage the tip leakage flow. Winglet-cavity tip, as a passive flow control, has been used to control tip leakage flow and improve aerodynamic performances in turbine cascades. In the present study, large eddy simulation (LES) is used for the flat tip turbine blade, cavity tip turbine blade, and winglet-cavity tip turbine blade. The calculation results of the LES show that, compared with the flat tip blade, the cavity tip blade and the winglet-cavity tip blade change the interaction between the tip leakage and passage vortexes. In the present study, the vortex structure is identified by the Q-criterion. According to the isosurface of Q, the winglet-cavity tip weakens the radial range of interaction between the tip leakage flow and the passage vortex due to its unique tip shape. The winglet structure on the pressure side can effectively reduce the leakage flow rate, and the winglet structure on the suction side changes the position and intensity of the tip leakage flow. After parametric optimization, the winglet-cavity tip shows excellent aerodynamic performances. In the case with a flat tip, the time-averaged total pressure loss coefficient is 10.81%. However, for the cavity and winglet-cavity tips, the time-averaged total pressure loss coefficient decreased by 9.17% and 17.43%, respectively.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4307000
    Collections
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV