Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSherif M. S. Osman
dc.contributor.authorM. Shahria Alam
dc.contributor.authorShamim A. Sheikh
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-17T22:16:01Z
dc.date.available2025-08-17T22:16:01Z
dc.date.copyright5/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.otherJSENDH.STENG-13591.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306685
dc.description.abstractTo ensure acceptable ductility and post-yield stiffness for bridge piers in seismic regions, double-confined steel (DCS) reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers could be effective design options. However, steel corrosion is a major problem for the long-term durability and resiliency of such important infrastructures. To protect such bridge columns, this study proposes that the exterior reinforcement layer be constructed with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) to protect it from deleterious substances and protect the inner steel reinforcement layer. The use of double-confined hybrid (DCH) offers improved distribution and ease of construction. The double-confined section consists of three levels of confinement: unconfined concrete (cover), singly confined concrete (between the two layers of spirals), and doubly-confined concrete (inside the inner layer of spirals or the core). However, one of the main challenges for DCH under lateral loads is finding a balance between durability and ductility requirements. This study delves into the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers, particularly DCS and DCH, under quasi-static cyclic loading. Through comprehensive experimental testing, the research showcased the distinct behavior of DCS and DCH in terms of their lateral load-carrying capacity, damage progression, and ductility. The observed hysteresis loops for both types denoted unique energy dissipation characteristics. Emphasis was given to the performance-based seismic design (PBD) approach, a method now prevalent in design codes. In line with CSA S6-19 guidelines, four performance levels were established, reflecting different damage states. The research further discussed the effective flexural stiffness of these configurations, noting variations based on axial load ratios. Furthermore, a practical design example based on PBD was presented, shedding light on the seismic behavior of RC bridge piers, with a focus on reinforcement configurations.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleLateral Cyclic Response of Large-Scale Bridge Piers with Double Steel and Hybrid Layers of Longitudinal and Transverse Reinforcements: An Experimental Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume151
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Structural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13591
dc.journal.fristpage04025042-1
dc.journal.lastpage04025042-23
dc.page23
dc.treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record