• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An Efficient Statistical Inference Approach for Model Calibration Using Griddy Gibbs Sampling

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    risk_011_03_031209.pdf (1.567Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Jay Wright, Stephen
    Stewart, Hannah
    Sharma, Shishir
    Redmond, Laura
    McMahan, Christopher
    Castanier, Matthew
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Model calibration is a critical step in many fields to ensure that decisions are made based on models that best capture the behavior of the physical system. Typically, an estimation of the uncertainty of the model is also needed to aid decision makers and to assess risks. Traditional statistical methods have met this need but come at a high computational expense, and thus they may be impractical in industries that desire rapid innovation and decision-making. Optimization and machine learning (ML) approaches offer computationally efficient algorithms for model calibration but do not provide a quantification of model uncertainty. This work proposes a statistical inference approach for model calibration, leveraging griddy Gibbs sampling to efficiently and flexibly calibrate models and provide an estimation of the posterior distribution for the calibrated variables. Using this approach, decision makers would gain a sense of the model uncertainty so that risk can appropriately be accounted for in decisions based upon the model results. The model is benchmarked against traditional Bayesian inference using a piston thermal model with unknown backside heat transfer boundary conditions as the benchmark model. When a sufficient number of simulations and sensor data points are used, the griddy Gibbs calibration provided nearly identical calibrations and 95% credible intervals (CI) on the calibrated variables to the traditional Bayesian calibration at a fraction of the computation cost.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305993
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV