Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeises, Ty
dc.contributor.authorMcTigue, Joshua
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-21T10:17:11Z
dc.date.available2025-04-21T10:17:11Z
dc.date.copyright9/26/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0742-4795
dc.identifier.othergtp_147_02_021008.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305871
dc.description.abstractPumped thermal energy storage (PTES) systems are grid batteries that use heat pumps to create both hot and cold thermal energy stores when there is excess electricity and then use a power cycle to convert the thermal energy into electricity when there is demand for electricity. In normal operation, Joule–Brayton PTES discharges low-grade heat at temperatures useful for thermal energy consumers like district and industrial heating. Furthermore, PTES designs, like conventional combined heat and power (CHP) technology, can be modified to sacrifice some round-trip efficiency (RTE) to increase the temperature of heat rejection. This paper uses design-point performance and cost models that provide a detailed understanding of the efficiency and cost tradeoffs of rejecting heat at various temperatures in ideal-gas Brayton PTES configurations. First, we keep the heat rejection in its nominal location in the PTES system: in the discharge cycle after the low-pressure exit of the recuperator before the cold-storage heat exchanger. Next, we move the heat rejection to the discharge turbine exit. We define design-point metrics that isolate both the cost and performance penalty associated with the hotter heat rejection and attribute it exclusively to the heat economic metrics. Finally, we estimate the performance of electric heater technology to generate heat at equivalent temperatures. We find that the levelized cost of heat (LCOH), including the cost of thermal energy storage (TES) buffering the PTES and heat off-taker, compares favorably versus electric technologies and is less than the cost of natural gas for low temperature scenarios and competitive with the cost of natural gas in some regions of the contiguous U.S. in high temperature scenarios.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleDesign-Point Techno-Economics of Brayton Cycle PTES for Combined Heat and Power
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume147
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4066256
dc.journal.fristpage21008-1
dc.journal.lastpage21008-9
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record