Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDonlin, Margo C.
dc.contributor.authorHigginson, Jill S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-21T10:16:13Z
dc.date.available2025-04-21T10:16:13Z
dc.date.copyright9/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0148-0731
dc.identifier.otherbio_146_12_121007.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305839
dc.description.abstractFunctional electrical stimulation (FES) is often used in poststroke gait rehabilitation to address decreased walking speed, foot drop, and decreased forward propulsion. However, not all individuals experience clinically meaningful improvements in gait function with stimulation. Previous research has developed adaptive functional electrical stimulation (AFES) systems that adjust stimulation timing and amplitude at every stride to deliver optimal stimulation. The purpose of this work was to determine the effects of a novel AFES system on functional gait outcomes and compare them to the effects of the existing FES system. Twenty-four individuals with chronic poststroke hemiparesis completed 64-min walking trials on an adaptive and fixed-speed treadmill with no stimulation, stimulation from the existing FES system, and stimulation from the AFES system. There was no significant effect of stimulation condition on walking speed, peak dorsiflexion angle, or peak propulsive force. Walking speed was significantly faster and peak propulsive force was significantly larger on the adaptive treadmill (ATM) than the fixed-speed treadmill (both p < 0.0001). Dorsiflexor stimulation timing was similar between stimulation conditions, but plantarflexor stimulation timing was significantly improved with the AFES system compared to the FES system (p = 0.0059). Variability between and within subjects was substantial, and some subjects experienced clinically meaningful improvements in walking speed, peak dorsiflexion angle, and peak propulsive force. However, not all subjects experienced benefits, suggesting that further research to characterize which subjects exhibit the best instantaneous response to FES is needed to optimize poststroke gait rehabilitation using FES.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleWe Will, We Will Shock You: Adaptive Versus Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals Post-Stroke
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4066419
dc.journal.fristpage121007-1
dc.journal.lastpage121007-9
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record