Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHill, Elyse D.
dc.contributor.authorSimon, Donald L.
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Joseph W.
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-21T10:13:12Z
dc.date.available2025-04-21T10:13:12Z
dc.date.copyright10/15/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0742-4795
dc.identifier.othergtp_147_04_041008.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305735
dc.description.abstractAs electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) systems continue to mature, more sophisticated hardware and software are being developed to balance operations among electric machines and gas-turbine engines. In hybrid-electric propulsion systems, the increased complexity resulting from integrating turbine-engine shafts with electric machines necessitates control methodologies to account for various physical domains. Ideal controllers for hybrid-electric engines manage systems, subsystems, and their interactions in a coordinated fashion, able to account for safety and performance goals while being computationally efficient. In a previous work, linear model predictive control (MPC) schemes were implemented in centralized and distributed frameworks on a nonlinear turbofan engine model as a proof of concept. However, these schemes were not evaluated for computational complexity, prompting further study. The research presented here develops hierarchical MPC schemes to reduce the computational burden of the previous MPC schemes. A two-tier framework is implemented, where a slower sampling MPC controls electric machines and determines fan-speed tracking goals for a faster sampling controller, which is either a MPC or a proportional-integral (PI) controller. The proposed designs are compared to the centralized MPC investigated previously, and performance is measured via fan speed tracking error, energy storage state-of-charge, and computation time. Results reveal that the hierarchical MPC scheme employing a lower-level PI controller improves computation time while maintaining comparable tracking and state-of-charge regulation to the centralized scheme.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Comparison of Model Predictive Control Architectures for Application to Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Systems
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume147
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4066422
dc.journal.fristpage41008-1
dc.journal.lastpage41008-8
dc.page8
dc.treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record