Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenbba, Rania
dc.contributor.authorAkhsassi, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorEl mouden, Hasnae
dc.contributor.authorWifaya, Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorOutzourhit, Abdelkader
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-21T10:11:14Z
dc.date.available2025-04-21T10:11:14Z
dc.date.copyright9/30/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0199-6231
dc.identifier.othersol_147_2_021008.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305668
dc.description.abstractBifacial modules are highly valued in the global photovoltaic market since they are able to receive sunlight from both sides and can generate up to 10–30% additional energy compared to monofacial ones. They are integrated into various sectors, including building and notably Agrivoltaics. In this work, a coupled optical–thermal–electrical model was developed in matlab to simulate the energy performance and bifacial gain for a ground-raised bifacial system. The model allows optimization as a function of the photovoltaic (PV) system and bifacial module characteristics. A fixed, south-facing bifacial PV arrays composed of three rows assumed installed in Agadir, Morocco, is considered. The optical model is based on an analytical determination of view factors using the cross-string rule. These enable the determination of irradiances received by both sides of modules, which are subsequently used to evaluate energy yield of the system. Model validation was carried out based on various statistical metrics by comparing our results with simulation results generated by various softwares. The comparison shows a very good agreement, notably with 3dbifacialvf (R2 = 1, root-mean-square error (RMSE) = 0.03 W/m2 and R2 = 0.96, RMSE = 12.4 W/m2) for front and rear side irradiance, respectively. The DC energy generated by the system differs by less than 1% compared to pvsyst results. Sensitivity analysis revealed that all system parameters, particularly ground albedo, positively affect the bifacial gain. The bifacial gain increased from 10.6% to 20.1% as the ground albedo increased from 0.25 to 0.5.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleView Factors Approach for Bifacial Photovoltaic Array Modeling: Bifacial Gain Sensitivity Analysis
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume147
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4066500
dc.journal.fristpage21008-1
dc.journal.lastpage21008-20
dc.page20
dc.treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2024:;volume( 147 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record