• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Validation Study on Dynamic Response and Failure Analysis of Large Unconfined Pipes Under Localized Blast Loading Using an Explicit Dynamic Approach

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    vvuq_009_04_041001.pdf (4.380Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Prasitpuriprecha, Nuttapoom
    Namchantra, Sirawit
    Priyadumkol, Jetsadaporn
    Phengpom, Tinnapob
    Suvanjumrat, Chakrit
    Promtong, Machimontorn
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study utilized an explicit dynamic approach to analyze the dynamic behavior of large-diameter pipes subjected to localized blast loading. The objective of the validation study was to investigate the effects of the explosion's blast force on the dynamic response and material behaviors in large-diameter pipes. The existing experimental data were benchmarked with the numerical results to assess the prediction accuracy. The crucial factors include the amount of the explosive mass (0.2–5.0 kg), the contact regions, and the wall thickness of the pipe (1.46 cm and 2.62 cm). As a result, the contact area significantly influenced the deformation range in each case, ranging from 50 to 400 cm2. The amount of explosive energy was crucial in determining the material response. For instance, deformations like pitting and spallation were found in the case when testing with less than 1.4 kg of TNT, whereas complete tearing in the central area was found in the case for higher explosive mass. With modest explosive mass, the pipe material underwent inelastic deformation. However, the material became vulnerable to adiabatic shearing failure when the explosive energy exceeded 1.4 kg in penetrating the 2.62 cm-thick walls. The difference between the simulations and experimental deformation (1.46-mm-thickness) was average at 8.5%, which presents an attractive tool. Therefore, this explicitdynamic tool will be used in subsequent research to study the responses of structural building systems to occasional explosion scenarios and capture the explosion fragments.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4305169
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV