Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiping Liao
dc.contributor.authorLong Chen
dc.contributor.authorYunchuan Yang
dc.contributor.authorShaokun Ma
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-20T10:29:30Z
dc.date.available2025-04-20T10:29:30Z
dc.date.copyright9/24/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.otherIJGNAI.GMENG-10108.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304827
dc.description.abstractThe instability process of the slope is governed by cohesion and dilatancy angle. The FEM and limit equilibrium method fail to accurately replicate the impact of cohesion and dilatancy angle on the dynamic instability of the slope. To address this limitation, this study employed a meshfree particle method known as smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Based on the Drucker–Prager yield criterion and elastoplastic constitutive model, the slope stability program was written in Fortran 90. This computational framework unveils the consequences of increasing the dilatancy angle on particle motion parameters, including velocity, displacement, time, and slope morphology. Furthermore, a comparative analysis was conducted to discern the variations in the sliding surface during slope plastic failure under conditions of zero and nonzero cohesion. This analysis serves to investigate the influence mechanisms of cohesion and dilatancy angle on slope stability. The research findings indicate the following key observations. First, the velocity, displacement, horizontal distance, and plastic strain of particle motion significantly increase as the dilatancy angle increases from 0° to 0.75φ (φ is the friction angle). The total duration of particle movement also increases correspondingly. When particles cease motion, the final morphology characterized by height and accumulation area increases as the dilatancy angle augments. Second, when the dilatancy angle is larger than 0.50 times the friction angle, the further increase in dilatancy angle has no significant effect on the particle motion. Third, when cohesion is zero, the slope fails to develop a shear band extending from the toe to the crest, and the sliding surface primarily adopts a linear form. When cohesion is present, the slope demonstrates an opposing pattern, and the sliding surface is mainly curved.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleInvestigating the Effect of Dilatancy Angle and Cohesion on Particle Motion Characteristics Using the SPH Method
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume24
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-10108
dc.journal.fristpage04024296-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024296-16
dc.page16
dc.treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2024:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record