• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Dissatisfaction Levels in Turkish Residential Buildings and Recommendations for Improving Quality

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JPCFEV.CFENG-4599.pdf (2.436Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Burak Oz
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    It is well known that many residential construction projects suffer from low quality due to a variety of factors; therefore, to find out the level of dissatisfaction among stakeholders, the underlying causes, and the recommendations, this study uses a survey. Owners, controllers, and contractors were asked to complete questionnaires online. To rank dissatisfaction levels, incomplete or defective works, and suggestions for improving construction quality, data from the survey were analyzed by frequency indexes (FIs), and project stakeholders’ perceptions were aggregated by “probabilistic or.” The study reveals that 52% of flat owners are somewhat satisfied with the building inspection company’s inspections, but most owners agreed (4.13±0.98) that consultants should inspect the construction, whereas the lowest dissatisfaction (1.71±1.30) is “getting smaller apartments than promised.” Construction dissatisfaction can be attributed primarily to “high-profit expectations by building contractors,” whereas “the lack of sufficient qualified workers,” “the lack of competence of building contractors,” and “incompetence and ineffectiveness of site chiefs/managers” are also prominent. From the perspective of controllers and contractors, the highest consensus (4.43±0.92; 4.24±0.85) is “needing to work with experienced construction site managers,” whereas the lowest dissatisfaction (2.57±0.72; 2.45±1.02) is “the overall quality of constructed residential buildings.” It appears that contractors’ dissatisfaction is lowest (2.42±0.95) when it comes to “contract-conforming construction quality.” A general dissatisfaction rate of close to average is reported by the owners, whereas the dissatisfaction rates of the controllers and contractors are close to “above average.” Based on the findings, this study provides valuable information and recommendations for improving the quality of construction for the successful completion of building projects.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304360
    Collections
    • Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV