Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMengchen Sun
dc.contributor.authorGiovanna Biscontin
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-20T10:13:06Z
dc.date.available2025-04-20T10:13:06Z
dc.date.copyright11/21/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.otherJGGEFK.GTENG-10565.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4304238
dc.description.abstractRealistic seismic shearing is usually not limited to a single direction. A number of studies on the effect of multidirectional shearing have proven that soil behaves differently under multidirectional loading compared with unidirectional shearing. One of the many differences refers to the inability of excess pore pressure to reach initial overburden stress under certain loading conditions, even if large deformation has occurred. To investigate the mechanisms behind the phenomenon, undrained cyclic simple shear tests were conducted on clean Hostun sand with various loading paths. Based on the test results, a conical failure surface is hypothesized and validated in (σv′, τX, τY) space. The failure cone can explain why the strike-direction stress paths in bidirectional tests cannot reach failure lines and also applies to unidirectional tests. An inverse correlation between limiting excess pore pressure ratios and total shear stress ratios can be derived from the failure cone equation.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleConical Failure Surface of Medium-Dense Hostun Sand in Undrained Multidirectional Simple Shear Tests
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume151
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10565
dc.journal.fristpage04024156-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024156-15
dc.page15
dc.treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2025:;Volume ( 151 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record