Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNicola Ritsch
dc.contributor.authorMichaela LaPatin
dc.contributor.authorLauryn Spearing
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Erian Armanios
dc.contributor.authorLeif Albertson
dc.contributor.authorLynn E. Katz
dc.contributor.authorKasey M. Faust
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-20T10:05:03Z
dc.date.available2025-04-20T10:05:03Z
dc.date.copyright8/29/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.otherJWRMD5.WRENG-6373.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303952
dc.description.abstractThe success of water system operation, maintenance, and management (OMM) critically depends on the local workforce. Extreme environmental conditions, limited financial resources, challenging supply chains, and increased technological requirements especially challenge the workforce to equitably and reliably deliver such OMM services in Alaska. To better understand these challenges, this paper presents a metasynthesis of the gray literature regarding water system management in Alaska, with a particular focus on workforce development and OMM regulation. This synthesis was conducted based on qualitatively coding 49 documents that were representative of the full corpus of 183 documents identified on this topic. While prior work tends to focus on a single regulatory level (national or state), this metasynthesis reveals important differences that occur between regulatory levels of government. More specifically, we find federal and state governments focus more on standardization (one size fits all), while regional and local governments focus more on situatedness (tailoring for every circumstance). This may have equity implications for water utilities in Alaska and other Arctic regions where national and state standards drastically differ and overlook local needs. We find that this theme of standardization versus situatedness may generalize to other state water systems, especially those with similar conditions as Alaska (such as Wyoming and Montana), as well as in other sectors in Alaska beyond water (such as environmental management, nursing, and aviation). Given the multilevel governance of water system OMM, these findings suggest that training materials and programs, certification processes, financial support, and policy decisions could be more effective if they consider the local context in which these water systems are situated more, especially when local conditions markedly differ from national norms. Such an approach may help better ensure more reliable and equitable access to safe drinking water in extreme settings such as those in Alaska and in the Arctic, more generally.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleStandardization versus Situatedness: A Gray Literature Metasynthesis of How Guidance for Alaska’s Water Infrastructure Management Varies by Government Level
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume150
dc.journal.issue11
dc.journal.titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6373
dc.journal.fristpage04024050-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024050-17
dc.page17
dc.treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 011
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record