• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Natural Hazards Review
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Probabilistic Analysis of a Three-Dimensional Slope Based on Limit Analysis

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    NHREFO.NHENG-2093.pdf (1.410Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Ran Yuan
    Zheng-peng Jia
    Jin-biao Sun
    Jia-long Ou
    Wen-fa Wang
    Yi He
    Jian-hong Jiang
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In traditional stability analyses of three-dimensional slopes, soil has often been treated as a homogeneous material with single-parameter properties, overlooking the variability inherent in the strength parameters and unit weight of natural soil. This oversight can lead to an overestimation of slope stability and reliability. To address this issue, this manuscript introduces a novel approach. Initially, a horn-shaped double logarithmic spiral failure mechanism for three-dimensional slopes is constructed based on the kinematic approach within the framework of limit analysis theory. The critical height of the three-dimensional slope is calculated using the mean values of soil properties. Subsequently, the stochastic response surface method is employed to formulate a limit state equation for three-dimensional slopes, with three different algorithms utilized to analyze failure probability. Two cases are employed to validate the proposed method and to assess the efficiency and accuracy of the algorithms. Further, a back analysis of the probabilistic distribution of strength parameters for three-dimensional slopes is performed using the stochastic response surface limit state equation. The findings reveal that the relative width of the three-dimensional slope, the coefficient of variation (COV) of strength parameters, and unit weight significantly affect slope reliability. An increase in relative width leads to higher failure probability, while larger COV values for strength parameters and unit weight correspond to higher failure probability. Through back analysis, the results considering parameter variability align more closely with strength parameters obtained from in situ experiments.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303759
    Collections
    • Natural Hazards Review

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV