Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhou, Zhaodong
dc.contributor.authorRother, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jun
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T19:05:17Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T19:05:17Z
dc.date.copyright4/3/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2689-6117
dc.identifier.otheraldsc_4_3_031002.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4303260
dc.description.abstractThis study compares the trajectory tracking performance of two- and four-wheel steering systems, especially under normal driving conditions. Specifically, the lateral motion is controlled by an event-triggered model predictive control (MPC), which activates either when consecutive control steps surpass the predictive horizon or when tracking error exceeds a predetermined lateral offset. Using a modified 1/10th scale Tamiya TT-02 RC car as a test platform, the tracking performance of both two- and four-wheel systems are evaluated. Results from the experiments highlight the better tracking performance of the four-wheel steering system over the traditional two-wheel systems and demonstrate the benefit of using event-triggered MPC for lateral motion control even under normal driving conditions, contrary to common belief that four-wheel steering systems are beneficial only in tight steering maneuvers.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparison of Two-Wheel and Four-Wheel Steering Using Event-Triggered Predictive Motion Control and Scale Vehicles
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume4
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4065093
dc.journal.fristpage31002-1
dc.journal.lastpage31002-6
dc.page6
dc.treeASME Letters in Dynamic Systems and Control:;2024:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record