| dc.description.abstract | Current total pressure measurement techniques in rotating detonation combustors (RDCs) are based on different assumptions and therefore show different applicability for specific RDC operating conditions, and few studies have directly compared these techniques. Therefore, this study comprehensively tested three total pressure measurement techniques: the direct Kiel probe method, the Mach-corrected capillary tube averaged pressure (CTAP) method, and the equivalent available pressure (EAP) method under different RDC geometries and mass flow rates, and compared them with their corresponding uncertainties considered. The results show that for all tests in this study, the EAP method shows the largest uncertainty range up to 24%, which is mainly contributed by the load cell calibration process, while the direct Kiel probe method has the lowest uncertainty range, which is consistently below 7%. These uncertainties were incorporated into the comparison between the three techniques via Gaussian process regression, showing that the direct Kiel probe method and the Mach-corrected CTAP method can present EAP-like total pressure. In particular, the total pressure of the single wave with counter-rotating components (SWCC) and L modes measured by the three techniques is very comparable. This work shows that the comparability of total pressure techniques depends on the specific RDC environment, and provides the possibility to evaluate the RDC performance with the simplest implementation. | |
