Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKlavaris, George
dc.contributor.authorXu, Min
dc.contributor.authorHill, Chris
dc.contributor.authorMenter, Florian
dc.contributor.authorPatwardhan, Saurabh
dc.contributor.authorVerma, Ishan
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T18:52:46Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T18:52:46Z
dc.date.copyright2/26/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0742-4795
dc.identifier.othergtp_146_08_081014.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302913
dc.description.abstractTurbulence modeling plays a crucial role in swirl-stabilized gas turbine combustors, typically relying on scale-resolved simulations (SRS) such as large eddy simulations (LES). However, LES is computationally expensive due to the need for fine mesh resolution and small time-steps required to capture the combustor's large-scale turbulence motion accurately. On the other hand, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models while computationally efficient, lack fidelity in predicting complex flow characteristics such as swirl accurately. In this study, the GEKO model is used for simulating RANS predictions of turbulence in a swirling flow scenario, whereas high-fidelity LES predictions serve as target data enabling field inversion via gradient-based optimization using the Adjoint solver in ansysfluent. Machine learning via neural network (NN) Training is employed to establish correlations between turbulent flow features and optimal GEKO parameters, enabling the trained model's generalization. This approach allows computationally faster simulations of swirling flow using an optimized GEKO model matching the predictions of LES. This methodology is tested on the DLR PRECCINSTA burner considering a nonreacting, isothermal flow scenario. The velocity field variance between LES and GEKO-RANS solutions is defined as the objective function, with the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) source coefficient serving as the tuning parameter. Results using the optimized GEKO model demonstrate qualitative and quantitative agreement with LES and experiments. The trained neural network (NN) model's generalization is tested on various flow conditions, including six additional Reynolds numbers and a reacting flow scenario, showcasing significant improvements over the baseline model solution. This optimized workflow holds promise for future studies involving different geometries with similar flow fields.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleTuning of Generalized K-Omega Turbulence Model by Using Adjoint Optimization and Machine Learning for Gas Turbine Combustor Applications
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4064367
dc.journal.fristpage81014-1
dc.journal.lastpage81014-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 008
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record