• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Configuration of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Applications: An Industrial Perspective

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    gtp_146_07_071006.pdf (3.511Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Pettinari, Matteo
    Dago, Gnandjuet Gaston Brice
    Frate, Guido Francesco
    Baccioli, Andrea
    Ferrari, Lorenzo
    Desideri, Umberto
    Amidei, Simone
    Cosi, Lorenzo
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Geothermal resources represent a valuable option to reduce fossil fuel-based power production because they feature an unmatched capacity factor among other renewable energy sources (RES). Geothermal resource availability reduces with the temperature. Therefore, developing cost-effective solutions to exploit low-temperature geothermal energy is mandatory to expand technology utilization. The standard solution for converting low-temperature thermal sources into power is organic rankine cycles (ORCs). ORC basic layout (subcritical) is well-known, but the more advanced alternatives, such as transcritical and two-pressure level cycles, are much less widespread, and it is unclear whether the higher efficiency justifies the higher capital cost. The paper focuses on the exploitation with ORC of geothermal resources (hot water) with a temperature lower than 200 °C and mass flow rates between 200 and 1400 m3/h for a target power production ranging from 3 to 30 MW. The paper compares three ORC layouts, subcritical, transcritical, and two pressure-level, from thermodynamic and economic points of view to map the most cost-effective solutions in the investigated size ranges. The techno-economic comparison considers the impact of the operating conditions and fluid on the machine's expected performance and the heat exchangers' size. As expected, more complicated layouts yield higher conversion efficiencies, with the two pressure-level cycles achieving the highest power output for the same geothermal source conditions. However, the economic analysis showed that the most efficient solutions are not always preferable when considering the cost-efficiency tradeoff.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302906
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV