• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Techno-Economic Analysis of the Solid Oxide Semi-Closed CO2 Cycle and Comparison With Other Power Generation Cycles With CO2 Capture

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    gtp_146_01_011016.pdf (1.586Mb)
    Date
    2023
    Author
    Martinelli, Matteo
    Scaccabarozzi, Roberto
    Gatti, Manuele
    Campanari, Stefano
    Martelli, Emanuele
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This work presents the techno-economic analysis of the solid oxide semi-closed CO2 cycle (SOS-CO2), a hybrid semi-closed cycle with solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) recently developed by Politecnico di Milano for power generation from natural gas with near-zero CO2 emissions. According to previous studies, the cycle is able to achieve an outstanding net electric efficiency of 75.7%. while capturing more than 99% of the generated CO2. All the cycles components, including the fuel cell and the turbine, have been designed and sized with the aim of assessing the performance and the capital cost. The energy and economic key performance indicators are compared with those of two benchmark cycles with CO2 capture: the Allam cycle and a combined cycle with amines. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is performed on the forecasted cost of the natural gas and the SOFC stacks. The results indicate that the specific total capital requirement of the SOS-CO2 cycle (2504 €/kWel) is considerably higher than the Allam cycle (1926 €/kWel) and combined cycle with amines (1981 €/kWel). On the other hand, the SOS-CO2 cycle benefits from its far higher efficiency (74.0% versus 53.9% of the Allam cycle and 52.8% of the combined cycle with amines) which makes the cycle less sensitive to the fuel cost and CO2 tax. In terms of cost of electricity, the SOS-CO2 cycle turns out to be the best technology for natural gas prices above 8 €/GJ, while the Allam cycle appears to be the preferred option at lower fuel prices. For a fuel cost of 12 €/GJ, the SOS-CO2 cycle features a cost of electricity of 106.2 €/MWh, lower than the Allam cycle (119.1 €/MWh) and the combined cycle with amines (126.9 €/MWh).
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302856
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV