Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchmid, Abigail C.
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Stephen A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T18:46:28Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T18:46:28Z
dc.date.copyright5/13/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2377-2158
dc.identifier.othervvuq_009_01_011003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302723
dc.description.abstractThe Davis equation of state (EOS) is commonly used to model thermodynamic relationships for high explosive (HE) reactants. Typically, the parameters in the EOS are calibrated, with uncertainty, using a Bayesian framework and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. However, MCMC methods are computationally expensive, especially for complex models with many parameters. This paper provides a comparison between MCMC and less computationally expensive Variational methods (Variational Bayesian and Hessian Variational Bayesian) for computing the posterior distribution and approximating the posterior covariance matrix based on heterogeneous experimental data. All three methods recover similar posterior distributions and posterior covariance matrices. This study demonstrates that for this EOS parameter calibration application, the assumptions made in the two Variational methods significantly reduce the computational cost but do not substantially change the results compared to MCMC.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titlePosterior Covariance Matrix Approximations
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume9
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4065378
dc.journal.fristpage11003-1
dc.journal.lastpage11003-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2024:;volume( 009 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record