• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Impact of Imperfect Kolsky Bar Experiments Across Different Scales Assessed Using Finite Elements

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    vvuq_009_01_011001.pdf (3.192Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Hannah, Thomas
    Martin, Valerie
    Ellis, Stephen
    Kraft, Reuben H.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Typical Kolsky bars are 10–20 mm in diameter with lengths of each main bar being on the scale of meters. To push 104+ strain rates, smaller systems are needed. As the diameter and mass decrease, the precision of the alignment must increase to maintain the same relative tolerance, and the potential impacts of gravity and friction change. Finite element models are typically generated assuming a perfect experiment with exact alignment and no gravity. Additionally, these simulations tend to take advantage of the radial symmetry of an ideal experiment, which removes any potential for modeling nonsymmetric effects, but has the benefit of reducing computational load. In this work, we discuss results from these fast-running symmetry models to establish a baseline and demonstrate their first-order use case. We then take advantage of high-performance computing techniques to generate half symmetry simulations using Abaqus® to model gravity and misalignment. The imperfection is initially modeled using a static general step followed by a dynamic explicit step to simulate the impact events. This multistep simulation structure can properly investigate the impact of these real-world, nonaxis symmetric effects. These simulations explore the impacts of these experimental realities and are described in detail to allow other researchers to implement a similar finite element (FE) modeling structure to aid in experimentation and diagnostic efforts. It is shown that of the two sizes evaluated, the smaller 3.16-mm system is more sensitive than the larger 12.7 mm system to such imperfections.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302721
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV