Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrzytarski, Pawel J.
dc.contributor.authorLengani, Davide
dc.contributor.authorSimoni, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, Andrew P. S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T18:43:37Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T18:43:37Z
dc.date.copyright5/8/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0889-504X
dc.identifier.otherturbo_146_10_101008.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4302633
dc.description.abstractIn this article, we study the role of turbulence transport on loss prediction using high fidelity scale-resolving simulations. For this purpose, we use eight high-fidelity simulation datasets and compute flux of entropy and stagnation pressure transport equation budgets for all the cases. We find that under certain unsteady inflow conditions, the stagnation pressure coefficient is not a reliable loss metric even at low Mach number conditions. This is due to the turbulence transport terms. The impact of these terms, typically assumed to be negligible, made stagnation pressure loss coefficient underpredict loss from 0% to over 40% when compared to entropy loss coefficient for cases considered here. This effect was most pronounced for the cases with highly unsteady inflow conditions and at low Reynolds numbers.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleThe Role of Turbulence Transport in Mechanical Energy Budgets
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue10
dc.journal.titleJournal of Turbomachinery
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4065287
dc.journal.fristpage101008-1
dc.journal.lastpage101008-10
dc.page10
dc.treeJournal of Turbomachinery:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 010
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record