• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Experimental Study of the Earth Pressure Evolution on a Model Wall Rotating about Its Base

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JGGEFK.GTENG-12163.pdf (10.90Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    David Perozzi
    Alexander M. Puzrin
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Quantifying the earth pressure acting on retaining structures is essential for a number of engineering applications, including the assessment of damaged structures. In response to the widespread corrosion found in many cantilever retaining walls in Switzerland, this study investigates the evolution of the earth pressure acting on a retaining wall rotating about its base: the dominant deformation mode for such structures. In a controlled setup, a scaled cantilever retaining wall is first backfilled and then subjected to rotation about its base. An extensive experimental program was conducted to evaluate the effects of different soil properties, packing densities, and initial soil stresses on the earth pressure during the life of a wall. Accurate measurements allow the stick-slip behavior typical of granular soils to be observed. An analysis of this behavior suggests that its impact on the practical safety assessment of retaining walls is negligible. Tests performed under 3D conditions show how local damage to a section of the wall results in a lower active earth pressure value on that section due to stress redistribution, which causes an increase in pressure on adjacent sections. It is also observed how the initial earth pressure acting on retaining walls after backfilling results from a perturbed stress state due to wall deflection and wall friction. Its distribution is bilinear for uncompacted soil and nonlinear for compacted soil. Loosely packed soil exerts higher pressures than densely packed soil. The unloading process shows the expected behavior of loose and dense soil: it is slower and monotonic in loose soil and faster in dense soil, where the initial unloading is followed by reloading due to softening in the backfill. The experimental results are available in a public repository and can serve as a resource for the development and validation of improved verification procedures.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298955
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV