• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of Various Parameters on Seismic Response of CBM Structures: A Numerical Investigation

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    PPSCFX.SCENG-1507.pdf (3.893Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    A. N. Shandilya
    A. Haldar
    Jhair Yacila
    S. Mandal
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Confined brick masonry (CBM) structures have demonstrated success in seismic regions due to their straightforward construction and efficient wall-to-column connections. However, there is not enough comprehensive understanding about how these structures respond to changes in geometry and material. Addressing this gap, our study employs a robust numerical technique, utilizing an integrated finite element macromodel. In this approach, we treat wall and tie members as a unified entity, enhancing computational efficiency. The concrete damage plasticity method is applied to predict the evolution of CBM wall damage, with a subsequent pushover analysis conducted to ascertain seismic capacity and response reduction factor. This factor is further used as a criterion to appraise the performance and seismic response of CBM walls. An extensive parametric study is carried out that compares the response of CBM wall with reinforced concrete (RC) infill wall, examines the impact of different opening sizes and confinement schemes around openings in CBM walls, and considers various masonry material properties. The study presents insights into damage propagation of CBM walls under seismic action particularly for cases of opening, confinement around opening, and material type. Findings indicate the superiority of CBM structures over RC infill walls, especially in earthquake-prone regions. Crucially, confinement around openings is identified as a pivotal factor in restoring lost strength, with Scheme A and E emerging as structurally and economically viable optimal confinement schemes. Furthermore, this study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate masonry type and mortar mix proportions in designing CBM walls for seismic resistance.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298477
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV