Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShihao Huang
dc.contributor.authorYu Qian
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T10:07:48Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T10:07:48Z
dc.date.copyright10/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.otherIJGNAI.GMENG-9642.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4298351
dc.description.abstractLarge-scale triaxial tests are popular for evaluating the mechanical properties of railroad ballast. The literature shows that different compaction methods have been used to prepare the samples. This research investigates the potential variation caused by different compaction methods, even when the samples are compacted to the same density. A series of triaxial tests are conducted, and the results confirm that the way in which ballast is compacted significantly affects its stiffness, but not its peak strength, as long as the density is consistent. Discrete-element method simulations are performed to explore this phenomenon and discover that stiffness variations are caused by different ways in which particles interlock and arrange themselves during compaction. Based on the findings from this study, it is recommended to consider the influence of compaction methods when conducting large-scale triaxial testing on railroad ballast or when evaluating the test results.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleDiscrete-Element Analysis for Compaction-Induced Stiffness Variation of Ballast Aggregate in Large-Scale Triaxial Testing
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume24
dc.journal.issue10
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9642
dc.journal.fristpage04024209-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024209-14
dc.page14
dc.treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2024:;Volume ( 024 ):;issue: 010
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record