• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Modeling Earthquake-Induced Landslide Risk for Mountain Railway Alignment Optimization

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    10.1061-AJRUA6.RUENG-1179.pdf (4.024Mb)
    Date
    2024/06/01
    Author
    Taoran Song
    Hao Pu
    T. Y. Yang
    Paul Schonfeld
    Xinjie Wan
    Wei Li
    Zhihui Zhu
    Hong Zhang
    Jianping Hu
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Construction investment and geological risk of a railway project are significantly influenced by the alignment design. Thus, for railways in earthquake-prone regions, the seismic risks should be addressed at the alignment decision-making stage. However, this is a challenging problem that should balance cost and risk appropriately. Especially in mountainous regions, besides direct ground shaking, earthquake-induced landslides greatly threaten railways’ construction and operation. Unfortunately, no existing studies in this field have accounted for that factor. In this paper, a novel potential earthquake-induced landslide risk model is proposed for mountain railway alignment optimization. In this model, a probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, critical acceleration computation, and landslide displacement estimation are first integrated. Together with the consideration of railway structures’ damage states, damage ratios, and restoration functions, the direct and indirect monetary losses caused by landslides to railways with specified alignments are evaluated. Then, the aforementioned analyses are incorporated into a previous cost-risk model and solved with a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Finally, the model’s effectiveness is tested in a complex railway example. It is found that the studied region is landslide prone, and railway structures, especially bridges, are vulnerable to landslides. Also, a biobjective analysis reveals the alignments can be more sensitive to risks than to costs. Lastly, according to the detailed engineering outputs, the computer-generated alignment is 11.8% less expensive and 27.2% safer than the best manually designed solution.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297300
    Collections
    • ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV