• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Rocking Bridge Columns with External Replaceable Tendons

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    10.1061-JBENF2.BEENG-6429.pdf (3.118Mb)
    Date
    2024/03/01
    Author
    Mostafa Tazarv
    Kallan Hart
    Ammad Khan
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Columns are usually the weak links in conventional bridges with regard to seismic design. Damage of reinforced concrete (RC) columns caused by moderate earthquakes is usually repairable, but significant damage is expected in the event of strong ground shaking. Advanced materials and/or innovative detailing have been developed for RC bridge columns to minimize damage while meeting or exceeding the ductility requirements per current codes. Rocking columns with either internal or external energy dissipators, commonly referred to as hybrid rocking columns, are novel columns with an improved seismic performance. Despite decades of research on rocking columns and promising laboratory findings, they have never been used in any bridge in the United States because of concerns regarding the accessibility and durability of internal tendons, and the lack of system redundancy when tendons are lost. The present study proposes a new class of rocking bridge columns that do not need internal pre- or post-tensioning tendons (or bars). Instead, tendons are placed outside of the column to be fully accessible and replaceable. One half-scale precast bridge column cast with ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) was tested twice under the same loading protocol. All external tendons were replaced in the second round of testing to validate repair by the fuse replacement technique. The damage of the precast UHPC column was insignificant throughout testing and retesting. Furthermore, the precast column showed the same displacement capacity, a slightly lower lateral strength, and insignificant residual displacements compared with those of a reference cast-in-place column (CIP). One drawback of the precast column was a lower effective stiffness compared with that of CIP column. A parametric pushover study was performed to investigate the seismic performance of the proposed columns with different fuse materials and lengths and to determine the best fuse configurations for a successful design. Finally, design guidelines were recommended to facilitate future investigations.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297285
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV