Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSuneelkumar Laveti
dc.contributor.authorYit-Jin Chen
dc.contributor.authorKok-Kwang Phoon
dc.contributor.authorAnjerick Topacio
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-27T22:38:14Z
dc.date.available2024-04-27T22:38:14Z
dc.date.issued2024/03/01
dc.identifier.other10.1061-AJRUA6.RUENG-1147.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297134
dc.description.abstractModel factors for barrette piles at the ultimate limit state under compression loading were evaluated in this study. A total of 64 rectangular pile load test results from different locations around the world were compiled as CYCU/Barrette/64. The database was divided into a drained group and an undrained group corresponding to the dominant soil conditions along the shaft length. The measured capacity was interpreted from a load–displacement curve using nine common methods. The model factors for barrette pile under compression loading were determined to provide engineers with the statistics to implement reliability-based design (RBD). It was found that the drained model factors (Qm/Qp), where Qm = interpreted capacity and Qp = predicted capacity, range from 0.57 to 1.09 and the undrained model factors range from 0.64 to 1.31. A model factor less than 1 is unconservative (predicted capacity is larger than the interpreted capacity). These model factors can be used to calibrate resistance factors for RBD at the ultimate limit state (ULS). Hyperbolic model factors were also determined to calibrate deformation factors for RBD at the serviceability limit state (SLS) at any tolerable displacement value. The mean hyperbolic model factors were determined as (1) mean a=15.65  mm and mean b=1.07 under drained conditions; and (2) mean a=15.86  mm and mean b=0.81 under undrained conditions. The load–displacement curves are fitted to these hyperbolic model factors (a and b) using Q/Qp=ρ/(a+bρ), where Q = applied load and ρ = pile head displacement. It was found that the model factors might depend on some input parameters, although there are insufficient load tests to establish this preliminary finding conclusively.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleEvaluation of Model Factors for Barrette Piles Based on CYCU/Barrette/64
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume10
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1147
dc.journal.fristpage04023056-1
dc.journal.lastpage04023056-25
dc.page25
dc.treeASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record