• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Impact of Graphene on Microstructure and Compressive Strength of Cement Mortars Utilizing Two Different Dispersion Methods

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    10.1061-PPSCFX.SCENG-1404.pdf (6.812Mb)
    Date
    2024/02/01
    Author
    Elhussien Elbatanouny
    Li Ai
    Edward Deaver
    Paul Ziehl
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Carbon-based nanomaterials are currently used to reinforce cement-based composite materials based on their superior properties. However, the mechanical performance of the cement-based composite materials can be improved by achieving an effective dispersion of nanomaterials in the cement matrix. Hence, this study investigates the effect of the surfactant coating method with or without the help of ultrasonication to promote the use of graphene in cement mortars. The dosages of graphene materials used were 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, and 0.04% by weight of cement. A commonly used polycarboxylate superplasticizer (PCE) was used as a dispersant agent of graphene with a surfactant-to-graphene weight ratio of 9∶1. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis was utilized to assess graphene aqueous suspensions and obtain the optimum surfactant-to-graphene weight ratio. In addition, compressive strength tests and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) micrographs were employed to verify the embedment and dispersion of graphene in the cement matrix. As a result, the 28-day compressive strength of the cement mortars containing graphene with 0.03% by weight of cement was enhanced by 17.5% and 13.7% for ultrasonication with surfactant coating and mechanical blending with surfactant coating employed as dispersion methods of graphene, respectively, compared to the control specimens. However, mechanical blending with surfactant coating is more convenient than ultrasonication with surfactant coating in terms of practicality and cost.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297056
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV