Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDong Wang
dc.contributor.authorXiarou Zheng
dc.contributor.authorXinyi Ye
dc.contributor.authorYan Bian
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-27T22:33:59Z
dc.date.available2024-04-27T22:33:59Z
dc.date.issued2024/06/01
dc.identifier.other10.1061-JUPDDM.UPENG-4840.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296956
dc.description.abstractTo alleviate the contradiction between supply and demand of urban and rural construction land and improve the utilization efficiency of rural homesteads, the state has issued policies to guide villagers withdrawing their homestead with subsidies or compensation. Previous studies have found that differentiation is one critical factor in villagers’ withdrawal from homesteads, but how differentiation affects the villagers’ withdrawal is not well interpreted. To explore and examine the homestead withdrawal mechanism, this paper identified and condensed the influence factors of villagers’ willingness to withdraw from homesteads from the perspective of differentiation, taking Kuikeng Village in Puning City, China, as an example. The results indicated that: (1) villagers’ differentiation has a significant impact on their willingness to withdraw from homesteads, and the higher the income differentiation level, the lower the willingness to withdraw from homesteads; (2) the health status of villagers, whether they are willing to change their identity, the confirmation of homestead rights, the holding period of homestead property rights, and the understanding of homestead exit policy are positively correlated with their willingness to withdraw from homesteads; and (3) villagers’ psychosocial characteristics, villagers’ differentiation, and government policy characteristics have a significant impact on homestead withdrawal. It is important to guide villagers to withdraw from homesteads and realize rational land use.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleDeterminant Factors of Villagers’ Willingness to Withdraw from Rural Homesteads in Differentiation Perspective: Evidence from Puning City in South China
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume150
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4840
dc.journal.fristpage04024016-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024016-9
dc.page9
dc.treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;2024:;Volume ( 150 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record