• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Physical Properties, Longitudinal Tensile Properties, and Bond Strength of the New Generation of GFRP Bars

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    10.1061-JCCOF2.CCENG-4300.pdf (1.684Mb)
    Date
    2023/12/01
    Author
    Brahim Benmokrane
    Shehab Mehany
    Carol Shield
    Antonio Nanni
    Vicki Brown
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper presents an experimental study that investigated the physical properties, longitudinal tensile properties, and bond strength of a new generation of glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Five commercially available types of GFRP bars with different surface treatments (deformed/ribbed, helically deformed, helically grooved, double helical wrap/sand-coated, and sand-coated) were selected for this investigation. Two bar sizes (No. 5 and No. 8)—with 15.9 and 25.4 mm nominal diameters representing the range of GFRP-reinforcing bars typically used in practice as longitudinal reinforcement in concrete flexural members—were selected from each of the manufacturers. The test results reveal that these new higher modulus GFRP bars have physical properties, tensile strength, and moduli of elasticity greatly exceeding the requirements of ASTM and Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standards. The GFRP bars had measured cross-sectional areas near or slightly over the maximum cross-sectional area allowed by ASTM standards. The mechanical properties reported in this study were based on nominal cross-sectional areas. The longitudinal tensile properties and bond strength of the GFRP bars satisfied the limits in ASTM and CSA standards. GFRP bar manufacturers have developed and are producing GFRP bars with guaranteed strengths that significantly exceed the ASTM minimum specifications. However, ASTM bases qualification methods for tensile strength on the minimum ASTM specified values, which could differ from the values implemented in the design. Until ASTM bases rejection on the strength used in design, the designer should add rejection criteria to the project specifications to ensure that GFRP bar acceptance is based on the strength assumed for design, which could be between the minimum value specified in ASTM and the manufacturer’s guaranteed value.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296415
    Collections
    • Journal of Composites for Construction

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV