Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAyaz Ahmad Khan
dc.contributor.authorRongrong Yu
dc.contributor.authorNing Gu
dc.contributor.authorTingting Liu
dc.contributor.authorJames Walsh
dc.contributor.authorSamad Sepasgozar
dc.contributor.authorDamien Crough
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-27T20:59:02Z
dc.date.available2024-04-27T20:59:02Z
dc.date.issued2023/12/01
dc.identifier.other10.1061-JAEIED.AEENG-1608.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296383
dc.description.abstractNumerous benefits are delivered by the utilization of volumetric modular construction (VMC); however, it carries unique risks at different project stages, which is one of the significant reasons for its low adoption. To date, scant research has adequately examined VMC’s risks during projects. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by identifying and assessing critical risk factors (CRFs) within VMC from different stakeholder group perspectives in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). A survey of 110 VMC professionals from Australia and NZ, which examined 31 specific CRFs, was established via a literature review. The CRFs were divided into their associated VMC project stage: (1) design and planning (DP); (2) off-site manufacturing (OM); (3) transport and logistics (TL); and (4) on-site assembly (OA). Fault tree analysis (FTA) was then used to analyze the CRFs. The results indicate that the DP stage risks are the most significant since they could affect VMC's downstream stages. Essential CRFs at each stage were design freeze or change order issues, module geometry conflicts, size and weight restrictions, and dimensional and geometrical variabilities. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study represents a first attempt at analyzing VMC CRFs in the Australian and NZ construction industry. Overall, this study could contribute to enhancing VMC practices and furthering VMC's adoption as a sustainable and circular construction practice.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleExploring Critical Risk Factors in Volumetric Modular Construction: Fault Tree Analysis with Stakeholders' Perspectives on Probability and Impact
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume29
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1608
dc.journal.fristpage04023037-1
dc.journal.lastpage04023037-18
dc.page18
dc.treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record