• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Water Supply Sustainability Revisited: Assessment Methodology for Multiple Water Resources

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    10.1061-JWRMD5.WRENG-6072.pdf (1.148Mb)
    Date
    2023/12/01
    Author
    Mehrdad Khoshoei
    Hamid R. Safavi
    Ashish Sharma
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The adequacy of existing water supply depends on a number of factors. These factors include water demand and its variations over time, the amount of water supplied on average, and the nature and types of the water supply alternatives available. A significant question with implications for all of these is whether the existing supply is sustainable in the long term. Answering this question becomes more important when demands are increasing to cater to rising human and animal populations and supply sources are changing due to increasing urbanization and a changing climate. This study presents a new basis for assessing water supply sustainability for regions that depend on multiple sources of supply. This new basis is defined using a multivariate water supply index attempting to join the various sources of supply into one. Water demand is ascertained not based on human needs but the water needs of growing vegetation. Use is made of traditional methods for assessing the adequacy of existing water storage using this multivariate supply and the associated demand, with the added consideration of any systematic decrease in the water supply that may be observed over time. This study uses a partly engineered semiarid basin to illustrate the proposed methodology. Upstream subbasins in this basin are anthropogenically unaffected and have natural vegetation demand and supply dependent on a single source (precipitation). Downstream subbasins, though, have demand dependent on the agricultural needs of the region and supply that is both natural and engineered through diversions from elsewhere. The water supply sustainability of the basin is shown to be dependent on the nature of demand and supply in each of the subbasins in focus. In general, the upstream basins are found to be sustainable according to the proposed index, whereas downstream subbasins are markedly unsustainable, requiring the introduction of a new water supply source or a reduction in the water demand for the region. The proposed method requires knowledge of all water sources applicable in a region, which include naturally occurring and engineered sources (such as diversions or groundwater pumping), while relying on remotely sensed vegetation estimates alone to quantify the applicable demand. As a result, it is possible to use this approach in most regions of the world that use water from a combination of naturally occurring and engineered water supply options and where water use is reflected through the vegetation sustained.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296317
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV