Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYi Zhao
dc.contributor.authorGuirong Yan
dc.contributor.authorJiamin Dang
dc.contributor.authorJohn W. van de Lindt
dc.contributor.authorJi Yun Lee
dc.contributor.authorDaphne S. LaDue
dc.contributor.authorCassandra A. Shivers-Williams
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-27T20:54:46Z
dc.date.available2024-04-27T20:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2023/12/01
dc.identifier.other10.1061-JSENDH.STENG-12325.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296228
dc.description.abstractTornado fatality rates in the southeastern United States are higher than those in Tornado Alley, despite Tornado Alley having a higher frequency of tornadoes. A major contributing factor is the large number of mobile and manufactured homes (MMHs) in the southeastern states. Forensic engineering assessments of tornado damage have consistently shown that inadequate anchoring of MMHs or the absence of proper anchoring has been the primary cause of structural failure. To properly design a MMH anchorage system to resist tornadic winds, it is imperative to have accurate knowledge of the tornadic wind effects on the MMH systems. In this study, tornado–MMH interactions are investigated using high-fidelity numerical simulations. The pressure distribution on the MMH surface and the total forces/moments on the entire MMH induced by tornadic winds are obtained. In addition, simulations are conducted to reveal (1) the difference in tornadic wind effects between a MMH and its associated permanent home (home with classical on-site construction), and (2) the difference in wind effects between tornadic winds and the equivalent straight-line winds. The latter of these comparisons is intended to provide information on the unconservative use of straight-line wind loading for MMHs. The simulation results (peak wind pressure and total forces/moments on the MMH) are compared between the tornadic wind field and straight-line wind field. The comparison indicates that the results caused by the tornado are higher. Under a tornadic wind field, compared with the permanent home (PH), the peak pressure and horizontal forces on the MMH are smaller because of the existence of open space under the MMH. Although the research findings here demonstrate the limitation of US code for MMHs, a great number of simulation cases with the related uncertainties involved will be needed to be run to improve the US code.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleUnderstanding Tornadic Wind Effects on Manufactured or Mobile Homes through High-Fidelity CFD Simulations
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume149
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleJournal of Structural Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12325
dc.journal.fristpage04023179-1
dc.journal.lastpage04023179-13
dc.page13
dc.treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record