Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZiran Zhou
dc.contributor.authorMarco Andreini
dc.contributor.authorLuca Sironi
dc.contributor.authorPierino Lestuzzi
dc.contributor.authorEdward Andò
dc.contributor.authorFrédéric Dubois
dc.contributor.authorDavide Bolognini
dc.contributor.authorFilippo Dacarro
dc.contributor.authorJosé E. Andrade
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-27T20:48:55Z
dc.date.available2024-04-27T20:48:55Z
dc.date.issued2023/12/01
dc.identifier.other10.1061-JENMDT.EMENG-7036.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4296019
dc.description.abstractVarious papers have presented different methods for computations of mechanics and kinematics of discrete structural systems. However, little has been done in comparing and benchmarking the seismic response from two different discrete-system-models with experiments. This paper presents a detailed seismic performance comparison between two models—level set discrete element method (LS-DEM) and Logiciel de Mécanique Gérant le Contact (LMGC90), calibrated with shake table experiments conducted on four concrete-block configurations. Theories of both models are thoroughly explained and compared. The simulation results are benchmarked against experimental data. Finally, the principal results and significance of this benchmarking effort is discussed.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleDiscrete Structural Systems Modeling: Benchmarking of LS-DEM and LMGC90 with Seismic Experiments
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume149
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7036
dc.journal.fristpage04023097-1
dc.journal.lastpage04023097-11
dc.page11
dc.treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2023:;Volume ( 149 ):;issue: 012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record