Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSinghose, William
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T22:45:31Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T22:45:31Z
dc.date.copyright4/2/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2332-9017
dc.identifier.otherrisk_010_03_034502.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295821
dc.description.abstractAs the height of telescoping-boom aerial lifts increase, the severity of tip-over accidents obviously increases. To reduce the probability of tip-over accidents, manufacturers use countermeasures such as outriggers and wheel axels that expand in width to provide a more stable base, counterweights to offset the moments generated by the telescoping boom, and controllers that limit the machine configurations to within stable envelopes. The size of stability margins is determined by industry standards that set the approved load capacity of the machine to less than the load that would induce tip-over. This paper investigates the effectiveness of such load-based safety margins for very tall aerial lifts with telescoping-booms. The results indicate that the industry standards result in both inconsistent and often low safety margins.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleDiminishing Safety Margins of Telescoping-Boom Aerial Lifts
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume10
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4065028
dc.journal.fristpage34502-1
dc.journal.lastpage34502-7
dc.page7
dc.treeASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg:;2024:;volume( 010 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record