Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHassenstein, Christian
dc.contributor.authorHeckel, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorTomasson, Ingimar
dc.contributor.authorVöhringer, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorBerendt, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorWassermann, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorPrager, Jens
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T22:42:32Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T22:42:32Z
dc.date.copyright3/21/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2572-3901
dc.identifier.othernde_7_2_021005.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295724
dc.description.abstractNondestructive testing has become an essential part of the maintenance of modern gas turbine blades and vanes since it provides an increase in both safety against critical failure and efficiency of operation. Targeted repairs of the blade's airfoil require localized wall thickness information. This information, however, is hard to obtain by nondestructive testing due to the complex shapes of surfaces, cavities, and material characteristics. To address this problem, we introduce an automated nondestructive testing system that scans the part using an immersed ultrasonic array probe guided by a robot arm. For imaging, we adopt a two-step, surface-adaptive Total Focusing Method (TFM) approach. For each test position, the TFM allows us to identify the outer surface, followed by calculating an adaptive image of the interior of the part, where the inner surface's position and shape are obtained. To handle the large volumes of data, the surface features are automatically extracted from the TFM images using specialized image processing algorithms. Subsequently, the collection of 2D extracted surface data is merged and smoothed in 3D space to form the outer and inner surfaces, facilitating wall thickness evaluation. With this approach, representative zones on two gas turbine vanes were tested, and the reconstructed wall thickness values were evaluated via comparison with reference data from an optical scan. For the test zones on two turbine vanes, average errors ranging from 0.05 mm to 0.1 mm were identified, with a standard deviation of 0.06–0.16 mm.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleAutomated Wall Thickness Evaluation for Turbine Blades Using Robot-Guided Ultrasonic Array Imaging
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume7
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4064998
dc.journal.fristpage21005-1
dc.journal.lastpage21005-12
dc.page12
dc.treeJournal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems:;2024:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record