Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYan, Lincan
dc.contributor.authorYantek, Dave S.
dc.contributor.authorDeGennaro, Cory R.
dc.contributor.authorSrednicki, Justin R.
dc.contributor.authorLambie, Brandin
dc.contributor.authorCarr, Jacob
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T22:28:30Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T22:28:30Z
dc.date.copyright11/30/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2832-8450
dc.identifier.otherht_146_03_031201.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295287
dc.description.abstractA breathable air source is required for a confined space such as an underground refuge alternative (RA) when it is occupied. To minimize the risk of suffocation, federal regulations require that mechanisms be provided and procedures be included so that, within the refuge alternative, the oxygen concentration is maintained at levels between 18.5% and 23% for 96 h. The regulation also requires that, during use of the RA, the concentration of carbon dioxide should not exceed 1%, and the concentration of carbon monoxide should not exceed 25 ppm. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) evaluated the cryogenic air supply's ability to provide breathable air for a refuge alternative. A propane smoker was used to simulate human breathing by burning propane gas which will consume O2 and generate CO2 and H2O. The rate of propane burned at the smoker was controlled to represent the O2 consumption rate for the breathing of a certain number of people. Two 96-h tests were conducted in a sealed shipping container, which was used as a surrogate for a refuge alternative. While burning propane gas to simulate human oxygen consumption, cryogenic air was provided to the shipping container to determine if the cryogenic air supply would keep the O2 level above 18.5% and CO2 level below 1% inside the shipping container as required by the federal regulations pertaining to refuge alternatives. Both of the 96-h tests simulated the breathing of 21 persons. The first test used the oxygen consumption rate (1.32 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person) specified in federal regulations, while the second test used the oxygen consumption rate specified by (Bernard et al. 2018, “Estimation of Metabolic Heat Input for Refuge Alternative Thermal Testing and Simulation,” Min. Eng., 70(8), pp. 50–54) (0.67 cu ft of pure oxygen per hour per person). The test data shows that during both 96-h tests, the oxygen level was maintained within a 21–23% range, and the CO2 level was maintained below 1% (0.2–0.45%). The information in this paper could be useful when applying a cryogenic air supply as a breathable air source for an underground refuge alternative or other confined space.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleCryogenic Air Supply Feasibility for a Confined Space: Underground Refuge Alternative Case Study
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4064062
dc.journal.fristpage31201-1
dc.journal.lastpage31201-7
dc.page7
dc.treeASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer:;2023:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record