Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHo, Howard Haonan
dc.contributor.authorEssel, Ebenezer Ekow
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Pierre Edward
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T22:22:56Z
dc.date.available2024-04-24T22:22:56Z
dc.date.copyright1/8/2024 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0098-2202
dc.identifier.otherfe_146_03_031302.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295112
dc.description.abstractThree different circular synthetic jet modeling inlet conditions are studied for a turbulent crossflow. The study examines the differences when modeling the whole synthetic jet actuators (SJA), neck-only or jet-slot-only under constant actuation frequency (f = 300 Hz), and crossflow blowing ratio (CB = 0.67). Phase-averaged and time-averaged results reveal that both whole SJA and neck-only methods generated nearly identical flow fields. For the neck-only case, a notable reduction in computational cost is achieved through the implementation of an analytical jet profile. The jet-slot-only method, on the other hand, introduces reversed flow during the ingestion cycle, leading to the injection of false-momentum into the crossflow. However, the false-momentum primarily affects the flow immediately downstream of the jet exit, with the boundary layer profile recovering rapidly. A parametric study highlights the importance of maintaining a volume ratio less than 1 of ingested to modeled neck volume to prevent the creation of false-momentum.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleImproving Three-Dimensional Synthetic Jet Modeling in a Crossflow
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume146
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4064185
dc.journal.fristpage31302-1
dc.journal.lastpage31302-12
dc.page12
dc.treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2024:;volume( 146 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record