• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analysis of Roll Decay for Surface-Ship Model Experiments With Uncertainty Estimates

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    vvuq_008_03_031002.pdf (3.221Mb)
    Date
    8/2/2023 1
    2023-08-02
    Author
    Park, Joel T.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Roll decay of David Taylor model basin (DTMB) Model 5720, a 23rd-scale free-running model of the research vessel (R/V) Melville, is evaluated with uncertainty estimates. Experimental roll-decay time series was accurately modeled as an exponentially decaying cosine function, which is the solution of a second-order ordinary differential equation for damping coefficient of less than one (N < 1). The curve-fit provides damping coefficient (N), period (T), and offset. Roll period in calm water was dependent on Froude number (Fr) and initial roll angle (a). Roll decay data are from 76 runs for three nominal Froude numbers, Fr = 0, 0.15, and 0.22. The initial roll angle variation was 3 deg–25 deg. The natural roll period was 2.139 ± 0.041 s (±1.9%). The decay coefficient data were approximated by a plane in three dimensions with Fr and initial roll amplitudes (a) as the independent variables. Curve-fit results are compared to decay coefficient by log decrement and period from time between zero crossings. Examples demonstrate average values for a single roll decay event from log decrement are the same as values by the curve-fitting method within uncertainty estimates. The uncertainty estimate for the decay coefficient is significantly less by curve-fit method in comparison to log-decrement method. By log decrement, the relative uncertainty increases with decreasing roll amplitude peak; consequently, focus should be on the damping coefficient at the largest peaks, where the uncertainty is the smallest.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4295057
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV