Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJamiolkowski, Megan A.
dc.contributor.authorGolding, Madelyn D.
dc.contributor.authorMalinauskas, Richard A.
dc.contributor.authorLu, Qijin
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-29T19:32:03Z
dc.date.available2023-11-29T19:32:03Z
dc.date.copyright7/25/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued7/25/2023 12:00:00 AM
dc.date.issued2023-07-25
dc.identifier.issn1932-6181
dc.identifier.othermed_017_03_031003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4294841
dc.description.abstractThe results of in vitro dynamic thrombogenicity testing of biomaterials and medical devices can be significantly impacted by test conditions. To develop and standardize a robust dynamic in vitro thrombogenicity tool, the key test parameters need to be appropriately evaluated and optimized. We used a flow loop test system previously developed in our laboratory to investigate the effects of sample length and the number of samples per test loop on the thrombogenicity results. Porcine blood heparinized to a donor-specific target concentration was recirculated at room temperature through polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing loops containing test materials for 1 h at 200 mL/min. Four test materials (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), latex, PVC, and silicone) with various thrombotic potentials in two sample lengths (12 and 18 cm) were examined. For the 12-cm long materials, two different test configurations (one and two samples per loop) were compared. Thrombogenicity was assessed through percent thrombus surface coverage, thrombus weight, and platelet count reduction in the blood. The test system was able to effectively differentiate the thrombogenicity profile of the materials (latex > silicone > PVC ≥ PTFE) at all test configurations. Increasing test sample length by 50% did not significantly impact the test results as both 12 and 18 cm sample lengths were shown to equally differentiate thrombotic potentials between the materials. The addition of a second test sample to each loop did not increase the test sensitivity and may produce confounding results, and thus a single test sample per loop is recommended.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleIn Vitro Thrombogenicity Testing of Biomaterials in a Dynamic Flow Loop: Effects of Length and Quantity of Test Samples
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume17
dc.journal.issue3
dc.journal.titleJournal of Medical Devices
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4062863
dc.journal.fristpage31003-1
dc.journal.lastpage31003-7
dc.page7
dc.treeJournal of Medical Devices:;2023:;volume( 017 ):;issue: 003
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record